Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Causal interaction between two beings requires the transm... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is no way to explain how one substance could causally influence another substance

    Causal interaction between two beings requires the transmission or transposition of parts between those beings

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Substances are simple, unextended entities that contain no parts

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    There is no way to explain how one substance could causally influence another su...

    Similar

    Causal interaction requires communality between the interacting entiti...79%Knowledge of entities requires causal interaction with those entities76%The interaction principle requires that mental events causally interac...76%Influx theory can only explain causal relations between entities that ...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: leibniz-mind
    View source passageHide passage
    He seems to think that causal interaction between two beings requires the transmission or transposition of the parts of those beings. But substances are simple unextended entities which contain no parts. Thus, there is no way to explain how one substance could influence another. Unfortunately, however, this line of reasoning would seem to also rule out one case of inter-substantial causation which Leibniz allows, viz., God’s concurrent causal action on finite simple substances.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective