Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Causes and effects must be logically distinct from each o... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Reasons cannot explain actions by causing them

    Causes and effects must be logically distinct from each other (Hume's requirement on causality)

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Reasons and the actions they explain bear a quasi-logical connection to each oth...Reasons cannot explain actions by causing them

    Similar

    The relationship of causality requires cause and effect to be logicall...89%The relationship of causality logically requires cause and effect to b...89%Applying the relationship of causality requires conceiving of cause A ...88%Parsimony in causal explanation requires assigning the same causes to ...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: anomalous-monism
    View source passageHide passage
    It is useful to view Davidson’s attack against psychophysical laws in light of an argument, in vogue in the 1950s and 1960s, against the claim that reasons are causes of the actions they explain. This argument was referred to as the “Logical Connection Argument” (see Stoutland 1970). According to this argument, reasons cannot be held to explain actions by causing them because (1) causes and effects must be logically distinct from each other (one of Hume’s requirements on causality) but (2) reaso

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective