Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Chalmers' hard problem demonstrates that the economic ana... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A similar, less-than-deductive criterion should suffice for explaining how consciousness might be caused or realized by nonconscious items

    Chalmers' hard problem demonstrates that the economic analogy fails precisely because consciousness resists third-person functional characterization.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Subjective qualia (redness, painfulness) have intrinsic properties irreducible to functional role or information processing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Economic systems lack explanatory gaps: we fully understand market behavior through structural relations, unlike consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Third-person descriptions of neural correlates cannot logically entail first-person phenomenal properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The explanatory gap may reflect epistemic limits in our concepts, not metaphysical non-functionality of consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Economics also involves irreducibly subjective elements (preferences, expectations) that resist complete third-person characterization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Functionalism successfully explains many mental phenomena; rejecting it entirely based on qualia alone overgeneralizes the problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    A similar, less-than-deductive criterion should suffice for explaining how consc...Economic systems lack explanatory gaps: we fully understand market behavior thro...Economics also involves irreducibly subjective elements (preferences, expectatio...Functionalism successfully explains many mental phenomena; rejecting it entirely...
    +3 moreShow less
    Subjective qualia (redness, painfulness) have intrinsic properties irreducible t...The explanatory gap may reflect epistemic limits in our concepts, not metaphysic...Third-person descriptions of neural correlates cannot logically entail first-per...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit