Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Christ's atoning work is sufficient to pay for all human sins

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Christ's divine nature gives infinite moral worth to his sacrifice, making it sufficient for infinite human debt.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.God's omnipotence means He can declare any sacrifice sufficient; Christ's work achieves what God intends it to achieve.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.New Testament texts explicitly claim Christ's blood covers all sins, past, present, and future (Hebrews 10:10-14).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.