Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Church's Thesis is an empirically supported thesis, not a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The justification for classifying specific problems as undecidable can be no stronger than the confidence placed in Church's Thesis.

    Church's Thesis is an empirically supported thesis, not a proven mathematical theorem.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The inference from 'not recursive' to 'not effectively decidable' depends entire...The justification for classifying specific problems as undecidable can be no str...Undecidability proofs proceed by showing that the characteristic function of a p...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The KS theorem is not empirically testable directly83%The Church-Turing thesis is corroborated by empirical evidence.82%Goldbach's Conjecture (GC) is not a mathematical proposition81%Carnap claims mathematical theorems are devoid of empirical content80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    , Immerman 1999). Like computational complexity theory, descriptive complexity theory also seeks to classify the complexity of infinite sets of combinatorial objects. However, the ‘complexity’ of a problem is now measured in terms of the logical resources which are required to define its instances relative to the class of all finite structures for an appropriate signature. 4 this approach often yields alternative characterizations of the same classes studied in computational complexity theory. g

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective