Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Civil ownership and civil use arose from man-made laws de... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Civil ownership and civil use as legal categories are consequences of the Fall

    Civil ownership and civil use arose from man-made laws designed to regulate property ownership

    Justice & PunishmentProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentProof of definition segments

    Connections

    1 topic

    Problem of Evil1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Before the Fall, use of created goods was communal and unencumbered by selfishne...Civil ownership and civil use as legal categories are consequences of the FallThe need to regulate property ownership is a result of postlapsarian selfishness

    Similar

    Civil ownership and civil use as legal categories are consequences of ...77%All civil dominium is ultimately grounded in property use rather than ...76%All civil dominium is based on the use of goods owned76%Wyclif defines civil dominium as proprietary lordship over goods of fo...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: wyclif-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Wyclif's definition of civil dominium as “proprietary lordship in a viator over the goods of fortune fully according to human law” is centered not on legislative authority, but on the private property ownership enjoyed by the viator, or wayfarer, along life's path (De Civili Dominio III ch. 11, p.178.9–17).[9] This is because all civil dominium is based on the use of goods owned, which is the basis for all postlapsarian conceptions of justice (recall that for Wyclif, only God truly owns create

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective