Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Claiming activity A is better than activity B because A p... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If Ross claims knowledge is not intrinsically valuable but intellectual activities are, then Ross cannot consistently claim that an intellectual activity is better when it issues in knowledge.

    Claiming activity A is better than activity B because A produces knowledge entails knowledge contributes value beyond the activity itself, contradicting Ross's restriction of intrinsic goodness to the activity alone.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Ross, W.D.(in ethics)
    A 20th-century British philosopher who argued that moral rules (like 'don't lie') aren't absolute—sometimes circumstances create exceptions—but exceptions can't be made arbitrarily.
    contradiction(Relevant to distinguishing contradictions from false contingent statements in the logic student variant of the preface paradox.)
    A statement that is necessarily false in all interpretations; in this context, specifically the negation of a tautology or any falsehood drawn from a list containing only tautologies and contradictions.
    entails(describes a logical relationship between statements)
    Logically forces or guarantees; if A entails B, then whenever A is true, B must also be true.
    extrinsic value(The only kind of value actions and activities possess under hedonism)
    Value something has solely insofar as it brings about intrinsic value or disvalue, whether mediately or directly.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    intrinsic goodness(Contrasted with extrinsic goodness in value theory.)
    That which is nonderivatively good; good for its own sake.
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    If Ross claims knowledge is not intrinsically valuable but intellectual activiti...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective