Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Classical approaches to statistical inference developed b... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The term 'Bayesian inductive logic' carrying the connotation of purely subjective probabilities is misleading.

    Classical approaches to statistical inference developed by Fisher and by Neyman & Pearson largely eschew Bayes' theorem and are therefore non-Bayesian.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The Bayesian/non-Bayesian distinction for inductive logics should turn on whethe...The current usage conflates the subjectivist/personalist account of belief with ...The term 'Bayesian inductive logic' carrying the connotation of purely subjectiv...

    Similar

    The main practical motivation for FOL-based approaches is to exploit e...78%Likelihood inference can fail to be statistically consistent78%Existing FOL inference techniques and technology are well-developed an...78%An inference that does not distinguish the target phenomenon from an a...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-inductive
    View source passageHide passage
    Elements of a logicist conception of inductive logic live on today as part of the general approach called Bayesian inductive logic. However, among philosophers and statisticians the term ‘Bayesian’ is now most closely associated with the subjectivist or personalist account of belief and decision. And the term ‘Bayesian inductive logic’ has come to carry the connotation of a logic that involves purely subjective probabilities. This usage is misleading since, for inductive logics, the Bayesian/non

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective