Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Classical theism, from Aquinas through Leibniz, holds that divine predicates require pure actuality (actus purus) with no admixture of unrealized potentiality.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Divine knowledge of future contingents seems to require God to not-yet-know them, suggesting unrealized epistemic potential in God's nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If creation was a free divine choice, God possessed the potential to create or not; pure actuality cannot account for this unconstrained agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Pure actuality without potentiality makes God's will appear determined rather than free, contradicting traditional divine freedom doctrines.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If God has unrealized potential, God could become different, implying present incompleteness incompatible with absolute perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Potentiality implies dependence on external conditions to actualize; divine independence requires pure actuality without such dependence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Temporal change requires transition between states; pure actuality avoids this, securing God's eternity and immutability as classical theism requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.