Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Classical utilitarianism is committed to both strict addi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Classical utilitarianism is subject to the repugnant conclusion.

    Classical utilitarianism is committed to both strict additivity and neutrality regarding which persons exist, as Sidgwick's 'Methods of Ethics' makes explicit in its impartial summation principle.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Classical Utilitarianism(Given as an example of ethical hedonism)
    A form of ethical hedonism that sees particular pleasant states as the goal of action, aiming at the maximization of pleasure
    Henry Sidgwick(The statement references his book and argument)
    A 19th-century British philosopher who wrote influential works on ethics and how people make moral decisions.
    Impartial summation principle(Sidgwick's core principle for calculating what's ethical)
    The rule that everyone's happiness counts equally and should be added up together without favoring any particular person.
    Methods of Ethics(the main work being referenced)
    Sidgwick's famous book that explores different ways of thinking about what we morally ought to do—basically a guide to ethical decision-making.
    Neutrality regarding which persons exist

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (a commitment of utilitarianism)
    The principle that it doesn't matter *who* experiences happiness, only that the total amount of happiness is maximized; it's neutral about whether people are born or not.
    Strict additivity(a feature of utilitarian calculation)
    The idea that total happiness is simply the sum of each person's happiness added together—like combining scores on a test.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Classical utilitarianism is subject to the repugnant conclusion.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective