Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Clifford's Rule prohibits belief whenever evidence is sil... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Clifford's Rule is irrational because it precludes access to dependent and restricted propositions

    Clifford's Rule prohibits belief whenever evidence is silent, not merely when evidence is contrary

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A rule that systematically excludes entire categories of accessible truths (depe...Clifford's Rule is irrational because it precludes access to dependent and restr...There exist dependent propositions whose truth can only be accessed by believing...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    There exist restricted propositions that are inaccessible without prior belief

    Similar

    Weak Evidentialism (E′) says nothing about what one must believe when ...87%Strong Evidentialism (E) forbids believing p when evidence is inadequa...83%Pascal's Wager recommends belief independent of the available evidence82%DB only specifies how belief (B) is not justified (i.e., not by infere...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pragmatic-belief-god
    View source passageHide passage
    This objection is interesting since it is in one sense true. It’s obvious that any rule that restricts belief in any way might shut us off from certain truths. Still, while interesting, this objection is irrelevant. James’s argument is not predicated on the abstract proposition that “any rule whatever that restricts belief in any way might conceivably shut us off from some truths.” It is predicated on the principle that there are dependent propositions, and there are restricted propositions. His

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective