Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Coercive state institutions lack the moral standing to impose 'lessons' on autonomous rational agents without their consent.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Autonomy itself depends on background conditions—education, health, rule of law—that states must coercively maintain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Rational agents sometimes lack information about consequences; paternalistic lessons can enhance rather than diminish autonomy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Complete non-coercion is impossible in social coordination; the question is whose values coercion serves, not whether it exists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Autonomy requires the capacity to form and pursue one's own conception of the good life without external direction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Coercive imposition of lessons treats rational agents as means to state ends, violating their status as self-governing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Legitimate authority requires consent from those subject to it; coercion without consent lacks this legitimacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.