Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Cognitivism is useless as an account of morality and as a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Cognitivism is useless as an account of morality and as an approach for inculcating morality.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Sentimentalism is the correct account of the nature of morality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If sentimentalism is correct, then morality is grounded in moral sentiments, not in cognition or reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Moral Responsibility
    1 linked

    Related

    If sentimentalism is correct, then morality is grounded in moral sentiments, not...Sentimentalism is the correct account of the nature of morality.

    Similar

    Sentimentalism is the correct account of the nature of morality.82%Empathy is insufficient as a foundation for morality because it is inh...80%Cognitivism is harmful to morality.80%Kant's arguments in Groundwork II do not establish that morality is mo...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: herder
    View source passageHide passage
    A further important aspect of Herder’s meta-ethics has already been touched on: the complex position that he already develops in How Philosophy Can Become that sentimentalism is the correct account of the nature of morality; that cognitivism is therefore useless as an account of morality or as an approach for inculcating it, and is moreover harmful because it provokes skepticism about morality and distracts people from the real foundations of morality and from reinforcing them; and that philosop
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit