Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Cohen argues that laws criminalizing takings without paym... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Lack of purchasing power constitutes a constraint on negative liberty, not merely a personal inability.

    Cohen argues that laws criminalizing takings without payment are what actually prevent the poor from acting, making the constraint social and interpersonal, not merely natural.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Without property laws, poor people could freely access resources for survival; laws create artificial scarcity by enforcing exclusion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Natural constraints (geography, physics) exist independently of human choice, but legal constraints reflect deliberate social design choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If we can change laws, we can remove barriers to poor people's action; natural limits cannot be legislated away so easily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Even without property laws, scarcity of goods and land creates real constraints on what anyone can take; legality is secondary to availability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Property laws also enable poor people to own things, make contracts, and plan futures; removing them might worsen their position overall.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction between 'social' and 'natural' constraints is unclear—all human action occurs within both natural and social conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Even without property laws, scarcity of goods and land creates real constraints ...If we can change laws, we can remove barriers to poor people's action; natural l...Lack of purchasing power constitutes a constraint on negative liberty, not merel...Natural constraints (geography, physics) exist independently of human choice, bu...
    +3 moreShow less
    Property laws also enable poor people to own things, make contracts, and plan fu...The distinction between 'social' and 'natural' constraints is unclear—all human ...Without property laws, poor people could freely access resources for survival; l...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit