Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Coherentism (BonJour, early; Quine) holds that justification arises from mutual support among beliefs, not from foundational basic sources.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
A coherent system of false beliefs (e.g., ancient astronomy) could be internally consistent without being justified.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Coherence alone cannot explain why perceptual experiences justify beliefs about external reality, not mere internal consistency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Two equally coherent but contradictory belief systems could exist; coherence lacks external constraint to prefer either one.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Foundationalism requires basic beliefs needing no justification, but all beliefs seem revisable upon reflection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Scientific theories gain credibility through systematic coherence and mutual explanatory support, not isolated foundations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Our beliefs about memory, perception, and logic mutually support each other—no single source grounds the entire system.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.