Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Communication premised on the less educated adopting elite standards reproduces hierarchy rather than transcending it.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Shared communication standards enable mutual understanding across groups; denying them isolates communities and prevents coalition-building.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Literacy and rhetorical skill are neutral tools; mastering them increases agency and opportunity regardless of whose standards they represent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Distinction between 'adopting standards' and 'learning skills' matters—acquiring competence isn't the same as surrendering identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Standard-setting power itself is a form of social hierarchy; requiring adoption rather than negotiation preserves that asymmetry.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
When less educated groups must change to be 'heard,' their perspectives and knowledge systems are implicitly devalued as inferior.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
True transcendence of hierarchy requires mutual adaptation, not unidirectional conformity to pre-existing elite norms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.