Comparative welfare-state research by Esping-Andersen shows liberal, conservative, and social-democratic regimes produce structurally different gender inequalities, disconfirming any singular automatic patriarchal re-adjustment.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Liberal regime(as one of three welfare state types)
In Esping-Andersen's framework, a welfare system (like in the USA) that emphasizes personal responsibility and keeps government benefits minimal, usually helping only the very poorest.
Patriarchal(as part of the phrase 'patriarchal re-adjustment')
A social system where men hold most of the power and authority, with advantages and privileges flowing to men over women.
Social-democratic regime(as one of three welfare state types)
In Esping-Andersen's framework, a welfare system (like in Scandinavia) that provides generous, universal benefits to all citizens regardless of income or employment status.
Welfare state(as the main subject of Esping-Andersen's research)
A government system that provides social safety nets like healthcare, unemployment benefits, pensions, and education to protect citizens from poverty and hardship.