Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Complacence in benevolence's beauty introduces an aesthetic pleasure that makes virtue contingent on sensory or emotional response.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Virtue grounded in sensory pleasure is unstable—moral actions motivated by beauty become vicious when beauty fades.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.True benevolence obligates action regardless of aesthetic reward; making it contingent corrupts the virtue itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Emotional pleasure is subjective and varies by individual; virtue cannot be contingent on unreliable sensory responses.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Humans are embodied beings; virtue divorced from emotional resonance lacks motivational force in actual moral practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Aesthetic experience of benevolence can reinforce virtuous habits by making them psychologically rewarding and repeatable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If virtue requires only abstract duty, it becomes alien to human nature and inaccessible to most moral agents.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.