Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Conflating the pragmatics of explanation with its semantics commits the use-mention error Frege warned against in distinguishing sense from assertion conditions.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The sense/assertion distinction may not map cleanly onto semantics/pragmatics; explanatory power often depends on pragmatic context unavoidably.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Frege's use-mention distinction targets linguistic reference, not explanation. Applying it here risks category confusion about what the error actually is.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Modern pragmatics shows semantic content is partly constituted by use-conditions. A sharp semantics/pragmatics divide may be philosophically outdated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Sense determines what a statement means; assertion conditions determine speech act force. Conflating them obscures this fundamental distinction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Pragmatic features (context, speaker intent) are use-dependent; semantic content is use-independent. Merging them commits the Fregean error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Explanations succeed or fail based on semantic content, not pragmatic uptake. Conflating these criteria makes explanation analysis incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.