Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Conforming to a non-desire based principle like the CI is... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is a gap between Kant's analytic claim about means-ends rationality and the synthetic conclusion that rational agency requires conforming to the Categorical Imperative

    Conforming to a non-desire based principle like the CI is a further, synthetic requirement

    Truth & KnowledgeVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Analytic claims cannot by themselves establish synthetic conclusionsThe means-ends principle is analytic of rational agencyThere is a gap between Kant's analytic claim about means-ends rationality and th...

    Similar

    Constitutive principles are not synthetic apriori principles.79%Natural but non-necessary desires need not be pursued.79%New Rational Reflection is a Non-Akrasia principle74%If a principle commands belief of itself, it does not require a prior ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    The apparent failure of Kant’s argument to establish the autonomy of the will, and hence the authority of moral demands over us, has not deterred his followers from trying to make good on this project. One strategy favored recently has been to turn back to the arguments of Groundwork II for help. Kant himself repeatedly claimed that these arguments are merely analytic but that they do not establish that there is anything that answers to the concepts he analyzes. The conclusions are thus fully co

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective