Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    (Cons) can express a truth at a vat-world only if its spe... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Premise (I) of the anti-skeptical semantic argument cannot be used without begging the question

    (Cons) can express a truth at a vat-world only if its speaker is not in a vat-world

    Philosophy of LanguageSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    (Cons) can express a truth at a vat-world only if the speaker of (Cons) is not i...

    Related

    (Cons) can express a truth at a vat-world only if the speaker of (Cons) is not i...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (Cons) is not disquotational
    Premise (I) of the anti-skeptical semantic argument cannot be used without beggi...
    The metalanguage expressing (Cons) cannot contain the object language to which u...
    +1 moreShow less
    The metalanguage used to express (Cons) is a language spoken only by non-BIVs

    Similar

    (Cons) can express a truth at a vat-world only if the speaker of (Cons...99%If the speaker were a BIV speaking vat-English, the speaker would not ...84%If disquotation holds for vat-English, then premise (A*) cannot be tru...83%If the speaker is a brain-in-a-vat, then (T) gives the truth condition...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: skepticism-content-externalism
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Brueckner, since (Cons) is not disquotational, the metalanguage in which it is expressed cannot contain the object language to which utterances of ‘I am a BIV’ (as meant in (Cons)) belongs. But then, Brueckner argues, (Cons) can express a truth at a vat-world only if its speaker is not in a vat-world. Here, Brueckner seems to reason that since the metalanguage being used to express (Cons) does not contain the object language being described (vat-English), the metalanguage being used

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective