Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Consequentialist punishment fails to respect the person punished as an autonomous moral agent.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Consequentialist frameworks like rule utilitarianism ground punishment in rules that themselves encode respect for persons as rational agents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Mill argued that utility properly understood includes the inviolability of individual rights as a paramount social interest, not merely aggregate welfare.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A system that protects persons from harm through credible deterrence can express greater respect for autonomy than one that ignores preventable violations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
P.F. Strawson showed that reactive attitudes like resentment and moral accountability are compatible with a broadly consequentialist social practice of punishment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Treating someone as a responsible agent whose choices warrant deterrent responses presupposes, rather than negates, their status as an autonomous moral agent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
Consequentialist punishment treats those punished as mere means to achieving some social good, rather than respecting them as ends in themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.