Consequentialist traditions from Bentham onward ground punishment's justification in deterrence and social utility, making rights-violation centrality a question-begging assumption favoring retributivism.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Deterrence(as used in criminal justice): Discouraging someone from doing something (usually a crime) by threatening punishment or making them afraid of the consequences.
Jeremy Bentham(as referenced for his theory of punishment): An 18th-century British philosopher who argued that the right action is whatever brings the most happiness to the most people, and that punishment should be used to deter crime.
Question-begging assumption(as used in logic and argumentation): When someone assumes their conclusion is already true while trying to prove it, which is a circular and unfair argument.
Retributivism(as used in ethics and justice philosophy): A theory of punishment that says people deserve to be punished in proportion to the harm they caused—the worse the crime, the harsher the punishment should be.
Rights-violation centrality(in the context of punishment philosophy): The idea that the core reason punishment is justified is because someone has violated another person's rights, not because of other benefits like deterrence.
Social utility(the refined form of self-interest): The usefulness or benefit that an action brings to society as a whole, rather than just to one person.
consequentialist(Shared position of Russell and Moore): One who believes that the rightness or otherwise of an act is in some way dependent on consequences.

1 topic