Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Constitutive conventions do not derive their existence fr... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Constitutive conventions cannot ground an obligation to engage in the practice they constitute.

    Constitutive conventions do not derive their existence from a prior obligation to solve a coordination problem.

    CausationSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationSocial Contract

    Connections

    3 topics

    Aesthetics2 linkedVirtue Ethics

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked
    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Constitutive conventions cannot ground an obligation to engage in the practice t...Constitutive conventions partly constitute the values inherent in the emergent s...Such values are only accessible to those who already care about the practice.

    Similar

    Coordination conventions emerge as solutions to large-scale and recurr...85%Norm subjects have an obligation to solve the coordination problem tha...84%Linguistic conventions have the logical form of coordination games84%Constitutive conventions cannot ground an obligation to engage in the ...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: lawphil-nature
    View source passageHide passage
    Explaining the rationale of legal authority, however, is not the only component of a theory about the normativity of law. If we hold the legal positivist thesis that law is essentially founded on social conventions, another important question arises here: how can a conventional practice give rise to reasons for action and, in particular, to obligations? Some legal philosophers claimed that conventional rules cannot, by themselves, give rise to obligations. As Leslie Green observed, Hart’s “view

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective