Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Constitutive principles are not synthetic apriori principles.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Kant's synthetic apriori judgments include constitutive frameworks like causality that structure experience before empirical confirmation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Constitutive principles like 'every event has a cause' are not arbitrary conventions but necessary preconditions for coherent experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If a principle is necessarily presupposed by any possible experience, it cannot be merely conventional in Schlick's deflationary sense.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Reichenbach's coordinative definitions, though conventional in form, carry synthetic content by determining which physical geometry applies to spacetime.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A principle that fixes the empirical meaning of theoretical terms does synthetic work even if its adoption involves choice among alternatives.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Constitutive principles are conventions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Conventions are neither apriori nor synthetic.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.