Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Contractarian theories of justice risk excluding the severely disabled, the global poor, and animals from the realm of justice

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Contractarian theories require that parties to the contract be able to contribute to the social product of interaction or threaten to destabilize it
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The severely disabled, the global poor, and animals may be unable to contribute to or threaten to destabilize the social product
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Those who cannot contribute or threaten have no basis for inclusion under contractarian terms
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.