Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Counterfactual possibilities of interference describe a feature of one's social situation, not one's liberty, which is an empirical rather than modal property.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Liberty inherently concerns what one is free to do, which depends on what interferences are possible, not just actual.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A society with ready-made counterfactual interference mechanisms systematically differs in freedom from one without them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Distinguishing social facts from modal properties collapses—institutional structures are precisely systems of potential interference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Liberty describes actual constraints on action (what one can do now), not mere possibilities of what others could do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Social interference patterns are observable facts about institutional structures, independent of counterfactual modal claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Two people with identical actual constraints have equal liberty regardless of how many counterfactual ways they could be blocked.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.