Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Counting 'sorts' of a virtue conflates the virtue itself with its situational expressions, a distinction central to Aquinas's account of virtue and its acts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Virtues necessarily require different cognitive and affective structures across domains (courage in battle differs fundamentally from moral courage).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction between virtue and act doesn't entail that contextual expressions are merely superficial—they reflect real substantive differences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Aquinas himself recognizes potential divisions (cardinal virtues, theological virtues), suggesting some taxonomy of virtue-types is compatible with his framework.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtues are stable dispositions of character, not collections of discrete behaviors that vary by context.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Aquinas distinguishes the virtue (habitus) from its external acts, which depend on prudential judgment about circumstances.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Cataloging 'sorts' suggests virtues fragment into multiple traits rather than manifesting as unified excellences in different situations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42