Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Cross-cultural psychology (Shweder et al.) shows the moral-conventional distinction is not universally replicated across all cultures.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Even if people articulate moral-conventional distinctions differently, the underlying cognitive structure may still be universal but expressed culturally.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Shweder's methodology relied on specific questions and contexts; different elicitation methods might reveal the distinction in supposedly non-replicating cultures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Domain-specificity theory suggests some universal foundations exist (harm, fairness) while cultural variation layers on top; partial replication isn't disproof.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Shweder's research on Oriya culture shows participants don't distinguish moral violations from convention violations the way Western subjects do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Cultural relativism about morality suggests what counts as moral vs conventional varies by social context and values, not universal cognition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If the distinction were truly universal, we'd expect consistent categorization across cultures; observed variation suggests it's culturally constructed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42