Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Cross-linguistic typological work (Evans and Levinson, 20... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Universal Grammar (UG) is innate

    Cross-linguistic typological work (Evans and Levinson, 2009) shows that purported linguistic universals are better characterized as tendencies with systematic exceptions, undermining the empirical basis for a fixed UG.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cross-linguistic typological work(as used in linguistics and language philosophy)
    Research that compares languages across the world to find patterns and differences in how they're structured.
    Empirical basis(describing what the research undermines)
    Evidence based on real-world observations and facts, rather than just theory or reasoning alone.
    Evans and Levinson(as cited authorities on language diversity)
    Two linguists (Nicholas Evans and Stephen Levinson) who published influential research challenging the idea that all languages follow the same universal rules.
    Fixed UG(as what the statement argues against)
    The idea that Universal Grammar is one unchanging set of rules that applies to all languages everywhere.
    Tendencies with systematic exceptions

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (as a more accurate description of language patterns)
    Patterns that usually show up in languages, but regularly have cases where they don't apply, rather than being absolute rules.
    Universal Grammar (UG)(Chomskyan linguistics)
    A theory positing innate representations of linguistic principles such as Binding Theory, Theta theory, the ECP, the principle of Greed, and Shortest Path that constrain the language acquisition mechanism
    linguistic universals(Examples include constraints on the movement of elements during a derivation and the syntactic distinction between nouns and verbs.)
    Features thought to be common to all natural languages.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Universal Grammar (UG) is innate

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective