Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Cultivating empathy has unique revolutionary powers to transform a world in crisis
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle and the Stoics grounded moral reform in reason and cultivated virtue, not affective identification with others' states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If structural injustice persists due to institutional arrangements, empathy's transformative power is epiphenomenal to the real causal levers of change.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Attributing revolutionary moral power uniquely to empathy commits the fallacy of misplaced concreteness by treating one affective capacity as sufficient for systemic reform.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Empathy is parochial by nature, extending preferentially to those similar or proximate to oneself (Bloom, Against Empathy, 2016).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A faculty that systematically favors in-group members cannot serve as the engine of universal moral transformation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Empathy is a force that can be cultivated
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Cultivating empathy produces transformative societal change
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42