Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Curious has forfeited her right to expect others to avoid... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Curious has forfeited her right to expect others to avoid exposing her to harm or to alleviate her burden if she is harmed.

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Curious disregarded warnings about the relevant risk.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Disregarding warnings constitutes forfeiture of the right to protection or alleviation from others (the Forfeiture View).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty

    Related

    Curious disregarded warnings about the relevant risk.Disregarding warnings constitutes forfeiture of the right to protection or allev...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Disregarding warnings constitutes forfeiture of the right to protectio...76%When one has knowingly and willingly risked something harmful, one can...74%Curious is substantively responsible for her burden and cannot hold ot...74%Consenting to a risk forfeits one's legitimate grounds for complaint w...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    Curious’s burden results, in a fairly predictable way, from her own reckless choice. Intuitively, this renders her substantively responsible for that burden. Curious cannot hold others responsible for her burden. For instance, she cannot sue the city (or its officials) to cover her medical costs. One natural explanation for this intuition is the Forfeiture View: by disregarding warnings, Curious has forfeited her right to expect others either to avoid exposing her to harm or to alleviate her bur
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit