Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Damian's position does not require him to deny the universal validity of the principle of non-contradiction

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Damian's concept of restoring virginity does not require interfering with past events
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The argument that Damian must deny the principle of non-contradiction assumed that restoration of virginity consists in removing past events
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If Damian does not share the assumption that restoration of virginity consists in removing past events, the two questions in De divina omnipotentia can be treated and answered separately
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.