Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Davidson's demand for physical conditions in strict psych... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The only potentially true and strict laws in which psychological predicates can figure are of the psychophysical form 'P1 & M1 & M2 → M3'

    Davidson's demand for physical conditions in strict psychophysical laws proves too much, as it would equally dissolve the lawhood of all special-science generalizations, not just psychological ones.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Davidson
    # Davidson Davidson most commonly refers to **Donald Davidson** (1917-2003), an influential American philosopher known for his work on the philosophy of mind and language. He developed important theories about how our thoughts connect to the physical world and how we understand meaning in language and communication. His ideas have shaped modern philosophy by challenging the view that the mind is completely separate from physical reality.
    dissolve(as used in philosophical argumentation)
    To break down, weaken, or disappear; in this context, to undermine or remove something's essential quality.
    lawhood(whether generalizations count as real laws)
    The quality of being a genuine, universal law or rule that always holds true, rather than just an accidental pattern.
    physical conditions(what Davidson requires for laws to be valid)
    Requirements that something must be made of matter or measurable through science; in other words, demanding that something be purely physical or material.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    psychophysical laws(epiphenomenalism)
    Contingent laws linking the occurrence of neural events of certain kinds with occurrences of qualitative events (qualia), held by epiphenomenalists to be independent of physical laws
    special-science generalizations(the other types of laws that would be affected by Davidson's demands)
    Broad patterns or rules discovered in sciences like biology, chemistry, or psychology—sciences that study specific levels of complexity rather than just fundamental physics.
    strict(describing the kind of psychophysical laws Davidson requires)
    In this context, it means absolute or allowing no exceptions—a strict law has no cases where it fails to apply.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    The only potentially true and strict laws in which psychological predicates can ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective