Davidson's own anomalous monism respects this boundary: it argues from logical features of mental discourse without prescribing what neuroscience or physics must discover empirically.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
A form of token identity theory holding that mental events are identical to physical events, but mental descriptions do not participate in strict causal laws due to the anomalous (non-law-governed) nature of intentional predicates.
empirically(as used in epistemology (how we know things))
Based on actual observations and real-world evidence rather than just ideas or beliefs.