Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Davidson's theory implies that both radical disagreement ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Davidson's foundational theory of meaning must be mistaken.

    Davidson's theory implies that both radical disagreement and radical error are impossible.

    Philosophy of LanguageSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Any theory that rules out what is genuinely possible must be mistaken.Davidson's foundational theory of meaning must be mistaken.Radical disagreement between communities is possible.Radical error about the nature of the world is possible.

    Similar

    A theory that makes error impossible cannot explain the observable phe...81%The hypothesis that Republic and Laws cannot contradict each other bec...77%Russell's theory fails to account for genuine moral disagreement betwe...77%The challenge can only be met by explaining how such disagreement is r...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: meaning
    View source passageHide passage
    By tying meaning and belief to truth, this sort of foundational theory of meaning implies that it is impossible for anyone who speaks a meaningful language to be radically mistaken about the nature of the world; and this implies that certain levels of radical disagreement between a pair of speakers or communities will also be impossible (since the beliefs of each community must be, by and large, true). This is a consequence of the view which Davidson embraced (see Davidson 1974b); but one might

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective