Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Defining dominance only over pure strategies would fail t... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Strict and weak dominance must be defined in terms of mixed strategies even in pure strategy contexts

    Defining dominance only over pure strategies would fail to detect such dominance relationships

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Strict and weak dominance must be defined in terms of mixed strategies even in p...There exist games in which a pure strategy is strictly or weakly dominated by a ...

    Similar

    The analogue of the strict dominance observation (that dominance is pr...84%Strict and weak dominance must be defined in terms of mixed strategies...83%No strategy can be a Nash equilibrium strategy if it is strictly domin...82%If a strategy is strictly dominated, it remains strictly dominated eve...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: epistemic-game
    View source passageHide passage
    The definitions of strict and weak dominance are given in terms of mixed strategies even though we are assuming that players only select pure strategies. That is, we are not considering situations in which players explicitly randomize. In particular, recall that only pure strategies are associated with states in a game model. Nonetheless, it is important to define strict/weak dominance in terms of mixed strategies because there are games in which a pure strategy is strictly (weakly) dominated by

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective