Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Defining union through motion and passion presupposes the very relation it purports to explain, since passion already implies a receiver united to a cause.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Passion and motion can explain union without circularity if union means temporal achievement, not pre-existing metaphysical fact.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The charge of presupposition confuses conceptual components with temporal priority; passion logically involves union without requiring prior union.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Process-based accounts avoid circularity by treating union as what emerges through causation, not what must precede causal description.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Passion logically requires a patient (receiver) and agent already related; explaining union via passion thus assumes prior unity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Circular explanation occurs when the definiendum (union) appears covertly in the definiens (passion and motion), making it non-explanatory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Any causal account of union must establish how distinct entities become one; passion presupposes this relation already holds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.