Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Definite descriptions such as 'Pedro's sister' can be accommodated when no prior discourse referent is available.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Accommodation is not a semantic operation but a pragmatic inference, so DRT's formal machinery cannot directly encode it without appeal to extra-theoretical resources.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Lewis (1979) showed that accommodation is governed by context-sensitive salience conditions that resist reduction to descriptive content richness alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If accommodation requires pragmatic reasoning beyond DRT's formal system, then 'Pedro's sister' succeeds not by DRT's rules but despite them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Strawson (1950) argued that definite descriptions presuppose a uniquely identifiable referent already available to interlocutors, not one constructed mid-discourse.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If Strawson is correct, then 'Pedro's sister' in a context without prior discourse referent produces presupposition failure, not successful accommodation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Accommodation becomes feasible when the referring expression provides enough descriptive content to identify a new referent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Definite descriptions like 'Pedro's sister' supply richer descriptive content than pronouns.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.