Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Democratic legitimacy derives from procedural fairness alone, not from substantive moral principles underlying the procedure (Christiano, 2008).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Procedures themselves embody substantive moral commitments (equality, liberty, dignity), so purity claims are incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Outcomes from 'fair' procedures can systematically violate basic rights, rendering procedural legitimacy alone morally insufficient.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Citizens rationally withdraw consent from procedures producing substantively unjust results, undermining stable legitimacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Procedural fairness is epistemically neutral, avoiding imposition of contested moral doctrines on pluralistic societies.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Equal participation in fair procedures respects citizens as moral equals regardless of substantive outcome preferences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Legitimacy grounded in procedure alone enables stable cooperation among citizens with fundamentally incompatible moral worldviews.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.