Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Demonstrating formally that the second machine class is n... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Whether the second machine class properly extends the first machine class is currently an open problem

    Demonstrating formally that the second machine class is not realistic would require proving separation results for complexity classes

    Proof of definition segmentsSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismProof of definition segments

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Those separation results are currently unresolvedWhether the second machine class properly extends the first machine class is cur...

    Similar

    Formally demonstrating that the second machine class does not provide ...95%Formally demonstrating that second machine class models are unrealisti...94%Members of the second machine class do not provide realistic represent...82%Members of the second machine class do not provide realistic represent...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    On the other hand, if \(x \not\in X\), then all of \(N\)’s computations from \(C_0(x)\) are required to lead to rejecting states. Non-deterministic machines are sometimes described as making undetermined ‘choices’ among different possible successor configurations at various points during their computation. But what the foregoing definitions actually describe is a tree \(\mathcal{T}^N_{C_0}\) of all possible computation sequences starting from a given configuration \(C_0\) for a deterministic mac

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective