Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Demonstratively identified individuals are directly referred to, not identified in virtue of qualities the agent uses to conceive the object
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Demonstrative reference requires a backing description to fix which object is demonstrated, as Searle argues in 'Intentionality' (1983).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If no descriptive content guides 'this,' reference fails when multiple objects fall within the perceptual field equally.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kaplan's own framework requires a context supplying a agent, time, and location, which constitutes a form of qualitative individuation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The character of a demonstrative is a rule that maps contextual qualitative features to referents, making description-independence illusory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Demonstrative identification picks out individuals through perceptual discrimination, not through descriptive qualities
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Descriptive identification picks out individuals in virtue of the agent's conception of the object via satisfying qualities
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42