Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Dennett and Dretske both argue that any property systematically correlated with adaptive behavior in evolved organisms must be granted causal status.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Systematic correlation with adaptive behavior can result from epiphenomenal byproducts of selected-for physical properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Causal status requires difference-making at the level of physical mechanism, not merely statistical correlation with outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Evolution explains property persistence, not causal efficacy; selection pressures are upstream causes, not the properties themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Evolution by natural selection explains why organisms have properties; explanatory indispensability indicates causal relevance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a property's presence vs. absence systematically affects organism fitness, it must be causally efficacious in producing behavior.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Denying causal status to adaptive properties leads to epiphenomenalism, which contradicts our best science of evolution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.