Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Dennett's Scientific Naturalism denies that persons are s... — Carmelics
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Scientific Naturalism (as articulated by Dennett) is incompatible with the claim that human persons have intrinsic dignity

    Dennett's Scientific Naturalism denies that persons are substantive selves that essentially possess a first-person point of view

    Consciousness & MindPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Moral Responsibility4 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Virtue Ethics
    1 linked

    Related

    Intrinsic dignity requires that human persons genuinely exist as substantive sel...On Dennett's view, treating humans as persons is merely adopting an 'intentional...Scientific Naturalism (as articulated by Dennett) is incompatible with the claim...Systems toward which we merely adopt an intentional stance cannot be truly auton...

    Similar

    Intrinsic dignity requires that human persons genuinely exist as subst...82%On Dennett's view, treating humans as persons is merely adopting an 'i...77%Vague Adams are not genuine individuals because their individual conce...77%The Abhidharma Buddhist holds that a person is nothing more than an ag...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-arguments-god
    View source passageHide passage
    If the claim that human persons have a kind of intrinsic dignity or worth is a true objective principle and if it provides a key foundational principle of morality, it is well worth asking what kinds of metaphysical implications the claim might have. This is the question that Mark Linville (2009, 417–446) pursues in the second moral argument he develops. Linville begins by noting that one could hardly hold that “human persons have intrinsic dignity” could be true if human persons do not exist. C

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective