Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Denying desert wholesale leads to moral nihilism, which t... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The objection that karma across lives requires a transmigrating self to justify desert can be resolved by rejecting the assumption that persons are ultimately real entities that bear moral properties like desert.

    Denying desert wholesale leads to moral nihilism, which the Buddha's middle path rejects.

    AnnihilationMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityAnnihilation

    Connections

    3 topics

    Personal Identity4 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    2 linked
    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    A more promising denial is that there are ultimately no persons to bear moral pr...Any two existing things must be either identical or distinct, so if two persons ...The Buddha asserts that the earlier and later person are neither the same nor di...The objection assumes persons deserve reward and punishment depending on the mor...
    +1 moreShow less
    The objection that karma across lives requires a transmigrating self to justify ...

    Similar

    Denying desert wholesale is tantamount to moral nihilism.91%A more promising denial is that there are ultimately no persons to bea...78%There is no way to rule out moral nihilism76%The Buddha's middle path strategy explicitly avoids nihilisms such as ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: buddha
    View source passageHide passage
    This excursus into what the Buddha meant by karma may help us see how his middle path strategy could be used to reply to the objection to non-self from rebirth. That objection was that the reward and punishment generated by karma across lives could never be deserved in the absence of a transmigrating self. The middle path strategy generally involves locating and rejecting an assumption shared by a pair of extreme views. In this case the views will be (1) that the person in the later life deserve

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective