Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Derived intentionality assigned by programmers to computa... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Computers cannot understand natural language sentences they receive or output.

    Derived intentionality assigned by programmers to computational outputs is categorically distinct from the original intentionality required for genuine understanding.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Intentionality requires causal history: programmers designed outputs for specific purposes, but systems lack independent goal-formation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Understanding involves phenomenal consciousness—subjective experience of meaning—which computational processes cannot possess by definition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Derived intentionality depends on external interpretation; genuine understanding is self-sustaining and requires no external mind to validate it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Human intentionality also has causal history: evolution and neurobiology shape our goals. Derivativeness alone doesn't disqualify understanding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Consciousness may not be necessary for understanding; a system could track truth-conditions and manipulate concepts without subjective experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction between 'original' and 'derived' intentionality cannot be clearly drawn—all intentionality emerges from prior physical processes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Computers cannot understand natural language sentences they receive or output.Consciousness may not be necessary for understanding; a system could track truth...Derived intentionality depends on external interpretation; genuine understanding...Human intentionality also has causal history: evolution and neurobiology shape o...
    +3 moreShow less
    Intentionality requires causal history: programmers designed outputs for specifi...The distinction between 'original' and 'derived' intentionality cannot be clearl...Understanding involves phenomenal consciousness—subjective experience of meaning...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit