Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Descartes' broader argument in the Third Meditation is vi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Descartes' broader argument in the Third Meditation is viciously circular

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Descartes begins his Third Meditation proofs of God by presupposing the general veracity of clear and distinct perception
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Descartes uses the clear and distinct perception rule in the course of demonstrating that rule
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An argument that assumes its conclusion in its premises is viciously circular
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    An argument that assumes its conclusion in its premises is viciously circularDescartes begins his Third Meditation proofs of God by presupposing the general ...Descartes uses the clear and distinct perception rule in the course of demonstra...

    Similar

    There is no vicious circularity in the broader argument for the Clarit...87%Rule-circular arguments are not necessarily viciously circular86%An argument that assumes its conclusion in its premises is viciously c...86%It is unclear why the circularity in Russell's regress argument is vic...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: descartes-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    Thus rendered, Descartes’ broader argument is viciously circular. The italicized segment of Arc 1 marks an addition to the original statement of it, thereby clarifying the circularity reading. Interpreted in this way, Descartes begins his Third Meditation proofs of God by presupposing the general veracity of clear and distinct perception. That is, he starts by assuming the C&D Rule and then uses the rule in the course of demonstrating it. Evidently, this way of reading Descartes’ argument ha
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit