Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Descartes' cogito does not assert that thought exhausts the self, but only that thinking entails existence as a minimal, indubitable fact.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The cogito's very structure ('I think') presupposes a unified subject, implicitly making thought constitutive of personal identity, not merely evidential.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Descartes treats thinking as the essential attribute of mind (res cogitans), making it the defining feature, not a minimal proof of existence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If thought doesn't exhaust the self, what non-thinking aspects remain indubitable? Descartes provides no coherent account of this remainder.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Descartes explicitly limits cogito's scope to establishing existence, not defining the complete nature of the self or consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The phrase 'I think, therefore I am' logically requires only that thinking guarantees some form of existence, not that thought constitutes the entire self.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Descartes later posits extension, emotion, and will as distinct from thought, suggesting he never intended cogito to exhaust the self.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.