Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Descartes distinguishes internal place (the extension con... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Descartes was not a supersubstantivalist

    Descartes distinguishes internal place (the extension constituting a body) from external place (its relation to surrounding bodies), treating the latter as purely relational and not as a fundamental ontological category (Pr II 13-15).

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Bodies are fundamentally defined by extension in three dimensions, making internal place metaphysically primitive and explanatorily sufficient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.External place depends on contingent facts about surrounding bodies, so it cannot ground the essential identity or nature of a body itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Treating external place as relational avoids the infinite regress problem of defining location through chains of spatial relations to other bodies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Pure extension without external relations fails to explain how bodies individuate as distinct entities; identity requires relational differences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Internal extension alone cannot determine whether a body has moved or remained stationary—motion is inherently a relational concept requiring external reference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Descartes' own physics uses gravitational and collision laws that presuppose external spatial relations as causally fundamental, contradicting his ontology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Descartes
    # Descartes René Descartes was a French philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s who fundamentally changed how people think about knowledge and the mind. He's famous for the idea "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum), which means that the very fact that you can think proves you exist—a foundation for modern philosophy. He also invented the coordinate system used in mathematics (the x and y axes on a graph), which connects geometry and algebra in practical ways we still use today.
    Ontological
    "Ontological" refers to questions about what actually exists or is real. It's concerned with the fundamental nature of being—asking "What kinds of things are there?" rather than "How do we know about them?" For example, an ontological question might be whether numbers, ideas, or God actually exist as real things, or if they're just human inventions.
    Pr II 13-15(as a citation to the source material)
    A reference to Descartes' book 'Principles of Philosophy,' Part 2, sections 13 through 15. It's how philosophers cite specific passages from classic works.
    Relational
    # Relational "Relational" means focusing on how things connect to and depend on each other, rather than looking at them in isolation. For example, a relational approach to understanding a person considers their family, friends, work, and community—not just their individual traits. In everyday use, it emphasizes that meaning, value, and identity often come from relationships and interactions rather than existing completely on their own.
    extension(Semantics and philosophy of language)
    Another term for reference, i.e., the object or set of objects a term picks out

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Bodies are fundamentally defined by extension in three dimensions, making intern...Descartes was not a supersubstantivalistDescartes' own physics uses gravitational and collision laws that presuppose ext...External place depends on contingent facts about surrounding bodies, so it canno...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Internal extension alone cannot determine whether a body has moved or remained s...Pure extension without external relations fails to explain how bodies individuat...Treating external place as relational avoids the infinite regress problem of def...