Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Descartes' First Meditation demonstrates that the reliability of the intellectual faculties that 'see' first principles is itself open to systematic doubt.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Descartes' doubt is methodological, not metaphysical—he suspends belief to find certainty, not to claim faculties are actually unreliable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
First principles like the law of non-contradiction cannot be doubted without self-contradiction, so they remain epistemically secure throughout.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Descartes' cogito argument succeeds precisely because intellectual intuition of his own existence survives the doubt, proving some faculties are reliable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Descartes systematically doubts sensory perception, memory, and reasoning through evil demon scenarios, showing no faculty escapes doubt.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The intellect's grasp of first principles (e.g., logical axioms) depends on cognitive reliability, which the meditation undermines universally.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Until Descartes establishes God's existence, he cannot certify that his intellectual faculties reliably access truth, leaving them doubtable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.